TALKING POINTS The change in the Chapter 70 distribution formula is based on more recent statistics and the process is more transparent than in prior years.  The distribution continues to be arbitrary and inequitable due to attempts that were made over the years to adjust the formula to the needs of individual cities and towns.  Now, communities with similar demographics may receive drastically different amounts of state aid.   As a result many communities continue to find it impossible to meet the educational and budgetary needs of their school systems. Many of the communities that suffered the 20% cut have begun to recover.  We ask that the communities that received the 20% cut and have still not reached target be raised to target level. We need a system of funding that is preventative and does not wait until a community loses population and or suffers an enrollment drop before it receives assistance.   We need a Chapter 70 formula that is sustainable, equitable, and predictable. One that can serve mature communities that have a stabilized growth as well as growing and transitional communities. The cost of technology, MCAS, and other basic necessities must be included in the foundation budget to raise everyone up. Continued legislative support to provide immediate relief to municipalities facing financial shortfalls as a result of Chapter 70 inequities and an insufficient foundation budget. Continued legislative support for designating appropriate educational funding by the spring of 2008 through a gradual increase in Chapter 70 funding as set out in the third year of the five year plan. Continued legislative consideration for the implications of an income tax roll back and it’s potential to decrease funds to public education. We must invest in our children and make public education funding a priority in 2008.